Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
59% | 41% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
59% | 41% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Spirit (-3.5) vs FaZe (+3.5) | 59% |
| Map Handicap: TS (-1.5) vs FaZe (+1.5) | 56% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Spirit (-3.5) vs FaZe (+3.5) | 54% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 49% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 46% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Spirit (-3.5) vs FaZe (+3.5) | 44% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 42% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 38% |
| Map 1 Winner | 28% |
| Map 2 Winner | 22% |
| Match Winner | 19% |
Market context
FaZe’s BO3 against Spirit in the BLAST Bounty Playoffs is priced by the market as a clear underdog, with the current crowd-implied probability at 28% YES. That sits below the kind of mid-30s to low-40s price ranges seen in earlier FaZe–Spirit matchups, where bookmaker-style previews often had Spirit around 1.3 decimal odds and FaZe closer to 3.6, reflecting a similar gap in perceived strength.[1] On platforms that show *decimal odds* rather than implied probability, that same 28% would translate to roughly 3.57 for FaZe before fees and spread, whereas on percentage-first venues such as prediction markets the number is easier to read but still needs adjustment for execution costs. Kalshi and Betfair also differ on access and friction: Kalshi uses USD and requires US KYC, while Betfair charges exchange commission and applies full KYC from the first trade.[5][6]
For context, Spirit have been treated as the stronger side in recent BLAST Bounty-related pricing, including a futures market where they traded around 46-49 cents to win the event, which is consistent with a team that often starts short in match markets against mid-tier opposition.[5] FaZe, by contrast, have repeatedly been priced as the side needing a cleaner veto or a longer series to upset stronger opponents, and historical previews in similar series have leaned towards Spirit to win 2-1 rather than a sweep.[4] That makes the current 28% less about a coin-flip and more about whether FaZe can exploit map choice and pressure Spirit on one of the tighter maps.
The main catalysts are the final match confirmation, any change to the start time, and roster or travel news, because prediction markets will usually reprice quickly if a scheduled BO3 is delayed, rescheduled, or affected by a standby substitute. BLAST’s own match listing identifies this as a playoff meeting between Spirit and FaZe, but traders should still watch the official broadcast and tournament pages for last-minute timing changes or bracket adjustments, since settlement depends on the match actually being played and completed.[7] Platform mechanics matter here too: Polymarket-style contracts settle on the event outcome with on-chain execution, whereas exchange books such as Betfair may show the same matchup through odds rather than a binary price, with commissions and liquidity affecting the effective entry price.[6]
Methodology
We read Counter-Strike: FaZe vs Spirit (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Playoffs from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade Counter-Strike: FaZe vs Spirit (BO3) - BLAST Bounty … on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →