🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Playoffs

Cross-platform snapshot for "Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Playoffs": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Map 1 Winner 100% Map 2 Winner 100% Match Winner 100% Map Handicap: FNC (-1.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+1.5) 100% Volume: $130K Closes: 4 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Playoffs

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Map 1 Winner100%
Map 2 Winner100%
Match Winner100%
Map Handicap: FNC (-1.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+1.5)100%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5100%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-3.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+3.5)100%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5100%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-6.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+6.5)100%
Map 3 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-3.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+3.5)50%
Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.550%
O/U 2.5 Games0%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-3.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+3.5)0%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.50%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-6.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+6.5)0%
Map Handicap: EAC (-1.5) vs fnatic (+1.5)0%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Esport Academy Copenhagen (-3.5) vs fnatic (+3.5)0%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Esport Academy Copenhagen (-9.5) vs fnatic (+9.5)0%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.50%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.50%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-9.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+9.5)0%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.50%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: fnatic (-12.5) vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (+12.5)0%

Market context

fnatic and Esport Academy Copenhagen were scheduled to meet in a best-of-three quarter-final at Stake Pulse Beat I, with both market and match data pointing to a straightforward fnatic win already being the base case. The live Robinhood contract was trading at 42¢ for Esport Academy Copenhagen and 63¢ for fnatic, while Strafe listed fnatic at a 100% win probability and ranked the teams #51 and #135 respectively, reflecting a large gap in recent results and roster depth.[8][5] Sofascore shows the series has now finished 2–0 to fnatic, which means any platform that resolves on the match winner rather than a separate map or round condition should already be aligned with fnatic as the settlement outcome.[2]

For comparison, this is the sort of spot where prediction markets and sportsbook-style books often diverge in presentation rather than direction: Polymarket tends to show an implied probability directly, while Robinhood and exchange-style venues are easier to read as price or cents, and Betfair/Smarkets usually express the same view as decimal odds before fees. In a one-sided esports quarter-final, the main practical differences are not the opinion on the favourite, but the trader’s actual cost of getting in and out, plus whether the platform is open to their jurisdiction and KYC profile. Polymarket’s event page also includes a 7-day delay or cancellation fallback to 50-50 on the listed market rules, which is material only if the match had not been completed on schedule.[3]

The main catalysts for any late repricing were the official start confirmation, scoreboard completion, and whether the fixture stayed on the planned August 4 slot; the match has already been marked finished on external scoreboards, which removes most of the schedule risk that would otherwise matter to settlement.[2][1] On a platform-comparison basis, that means the remaining question is less about competitive uncertainty and more about contract design: one venue may settle off the match winner, while another may reference a map-total or round-total condition if the product is different from the headline event.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Esport Academy Copenhagen (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Playoffs specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
What about Smarkets as an alternative?
Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Are all these platforms regulated?
No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Esport Academy Copenhagen … on Robinhood Prediction Markets

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →