Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
75% | 25% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
75% | 25% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 75% |
| Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs Infinite (+1.5) | 73% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs Infinite (+6.5) | 55% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 50% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 45% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 28% |
| Map 2 Winner | 27% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 25% |
| Match Winner | 10% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
Market context
Infinite meet 100 Thieves in a best-of-three Round of 32 tie at the Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins, with the current crowd price implying about a 31% chance of an Infinite win. On Polymarket, that reads as a simple percentage; on Betfair or Smarkets, the same view would typically be expressed as decimal odds, with the implied probability backed out from the price after accounting for commission or fees. The market is live because the fixture is listed for 9:00 AM on 9 August, and the qualifier itself is a short August 7-9 event with 32 teams competing for a place in the main EWC bracket.[1][3][7][8]
By comparison, the broader market context leans towards 100 Thieves. Dust2 and Strafe both list 100 Thieves as the higher-ranked side, with global ranks of 37 to Infinite’s 49, while Strafe’s user vote is heavily one-sided in favour of 100 Thieves at 95%.[1][14] That makes a 31% Infinite price look like a moderate underdog position rather than a long-shot flier. On a traditional bookmaker exchange, the same matchup would usually be narrower to enter because of KYC and jurisdiction limits, whereas Polymarket-style markets are open to crypto-native liquidity but can move more sharply on thin volume.[7][11][14]
Traders should watch for any scheduling or bracket updates, because this qualifier is concentrated into a single day and the result depends on the match actually starting and completing within the settlement window.[3][8] If the play-in is delayed, reordered, or left unfinished, the market’s fallback rules matter more than the pre-match price, and that is especially relevant in open qualifiers where late-running series can cascade through the slate. 100 Thieves also arrive with fresh qualifier context from recent Esports World Cup-related results in other titles, which can pull attention to the organisation even when the CS2 roster is a separate question.[12]
Methodology
This page compares Counter-Strike: Infinite vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade Counter-Strike: Infinite vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Espo… on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →