🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

Counter-Strike: NIP vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Group D

Cross-platform snapshot for "Counter-Strike: NIP vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Group D": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Map 2 Winner 100% O/U 2.5 Games 100% Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 100% Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 100% Volume: $702K Liquidity: $656K Closes: 22 Jul 2026
Open live market →
Counter-Strike: NIP vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Group D

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Map 2 Winner100%
O/U 2.5 Games100%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5100%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5100%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs 100 Thieves (+3.5)100%
Match Winner92%
Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.550%
Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5)50%
Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.550%
Map 3 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs 100 Thieves (+3.5)50%
Map 3 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-6.5) vs 100 Thieves (+6.5)50%
Map 1 Winner0%
Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs NIP (+1.5)0%
Map Handicap: NIP (-1.5) vs 100 Thieves (+1.5)0%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.50%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5)0%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-9.5) vs NIP (+9.5)0%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.50%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.50%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-6.5) vs 100 Thieves (+6.5)0%

Market context

Counter-Strike’s StarLadder StarSeries Group D pairing between Ninjas in Pyjamas and 100 Thieves is a best-of-three market that is already being priced as extremely one-sided, with the crowd-implied probability at 0% for the current YES side. A recent match preview on BO3.gg still called NiP the favoured side and projected a 2:1 win over 100 Thieves, which is directionally consistent with a market where the weaker team is being given almost no chance.[1] In platform-comparison terms, Polymarket expresses that view directly as implied probability, while Kalshi-style contracts and many sportsbook-like screens are usually easier to read in decimal or price terms; Betfair and Smarkets then add another layer because the realised cost of backing a side depends on exchange commission and whether the market is effectively tradeable at the displayed price.

The key historical frame for a 0% reading is not that an upset is impossible, but that the market is treating it as too remote to quote meaningfully before the match starts. In esports, especially BO3s, the better indicator is often whether the schedule holds and whether both line-ups actually arrive intact, because late roster changes, walkovers, forfeits or cancellations can matter as much as form. Here, the settlement rules also matter across platforms: if the match is not played, is tied, or slips beyond the allowed delay window without a winner, the contract resolves 50-50, so a trader is not only assessing competitive strength but also whether the event survives to a clean finish.[1]

Catalysts are straightforward: any official confirmation that the fixture remains on the day’s StarSeries slate, plus line-up news or a format change, can move a thin market quickly. If the match starts on time, the main driver becomes map veto quality and first-map edge; if it is postponed, withdrawn, or abandoned, the settlement path may matter more than the on-server result. On venues like Betfair or Smarkets, that kind of operational risk is usually reflected through live order-book repricing and commission-adjusted payouts, whereas on Kalshi and Polymarket the same event is typically discussed as a binary probability that can jump sharply on schedule updates.[1]

Sources: 1

Methodology

We read Counter-Strike: NIP vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Group D from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.

FAQ

What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
What about Smarkets as an alternative?
Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Which platform is accessible globally?
Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: NIP vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - StarLadde… on Robinhood Prediction Markets

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →