🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In

Which venue prices "LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In" best? Direct comparison of Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair and Smarkets.

Both Teams Slay a Dragon 69% Both Teams Slay a Dragon 69% Both Teams Slay a Dragon 68% Game Handicap: TL (-1.5) vs Deep Cross Gaming (+1.5) 67% Volume: $139K Liquidity: $506K Closes: 29 Jun 2026
Open live market →
LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
69% 31% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
69% 31% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Both Teams Slay a Dragon69%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon69%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon68%
Game Handicap: TL (-1.5) vs Deep Cross Gaming (+1.5)67%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2?64%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 3?63%
O/U 3.5 Games63%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?62%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor53%
Any Player Quadra Kill53%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2?53%
Any Player Quadra Kill53%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor52%
Any Player Penta Kill52%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3?52%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors51%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 4?51%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors51%
First Blood in Game 1?50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
First Blood in Game 4?50%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4?50%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4?50%
Any Player Penta Kill50%
First Blood in Game 3?50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1?49%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon44%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon44%
Game 4 Winner39%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1?36%
Game Handicap: TL (-2.5) vs Deep Cross Gaming (+2.5)35%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2?34%
First Blood in Game 2?33%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3?33%
Game 1 Winner33%
Game 2 Winner33%
Game 3 Winner32%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor28%
Any Player Quadra Kill28%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor28%
Any Player Quadra Kill28%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor28%
Any Player Quadra Kill28%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors27%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors27%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors27%
Any Player Penta Kill26%
Any Player Penta Kill26%
Any Player Penta Kill26%
O/U 4.5 Games24%
Match Winner19%

Market context

On 29 June 2026 at 08:00 BST, Deep Cross Gaming and Team Liquid face off in the League of Legends Mid-Season Invitational Play-In lower bracket semifinal, a Best-of-5 series where the winner advances and the loser exits the tournament. The crowd-implied probability sits at 50% for Deep Cross Gaming, reflecting a market split that diverges sharply from external voting data showing Team Liquid favoured with 71.5% support[2]. This 50% baseline is a structural default on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi for unresolved or cancelled events, whereas Betfair and Smarkets would price the void outcome separately rather than forcing a 50-50 settlement[1][6].

Historically, lower bracket MSI matches between regional qualifiers and established Western teams have seen the latter win 68% of the time, yet Deep Cross Gaming’s prior 0-3 loss to Karmine Corp introduces significant volatility[2][3]. Comparable cases from 2024 and 2025 show that teams recovering from opening round defeats often win the next match 55% of the time, but only when they secure a first-game inhibitor, a condition not guaranteed here[1]. The 50% price on Polymarket contrasts with Kalshi’s decimal odds format, where the implied probability of Team Liquid winning would be 71.5% if not adjusted for the void clause, highlighting how fee structures and KYC reach alter pricing across platforms[6].

Traders must monitor the live match schedule for any delays beyond seven days, which would trigger the 50-50 resolution, and watch for in-game inhibitor destruction in Game 1, a key catalyst for momentum[1][7]. Recent betting tips note both teams suffered 0-3 opening losses, making the first-game performance critical for psychological advantage[10]. No official roster changes have been announced, but any delay in the 08:00 BST start time could signal logistical issues that affect the settlement window ending 2026-06-29[2][7]. The divergence between Polymarket’s implied probability and Kalshi’s decimal odds remains a key factor for platform-comparison researchers evaluating market efficiency.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
What about Smarkets as an alternative?
Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Are all these platforms regulated?
No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
and

Trade LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Se… on Robinhood Prediction Markets

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →