Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
60% | 40% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
60% | 40% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game Handicap: TES (-1.5) vs EDward Gaming (+1.5) | 60% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1? | 57% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2? | 57% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 52% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 44% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 43% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 34% |
| Game 2 Winner | 26% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| Game 1 Winner | 25% |
| Match Winner | 17% |
Market context
EDward Gaming against Top Esports is a straight best-of-three in the LPL Group Ascend, and the crowd’s 24% YES implies EDG are priced as a clear underdog. That sits below a simple even-money view and is broadly consistent with recent head-to-head history, where Top Esports have dominated the series and won the latest meeting 2-0 in January 2024[9][1]. On the same matchup, platforms that show *implied probability* such as Polymarket can be read directly against that 24%, while books like Betfair or Smarkets usually present *decimal odds* instead, so the same view will look different once fees and commission are stripped out; those costs matter most on tighter-priced esports markets.
Comparable results also point towards TES being favoured, but not by enough to ignore volatility in a Bo3. Strafe’s historical summary has Top Esports winning 13 of the last 15 meetings, while other match logs show EDG have taken occasional series in earlier seasons, including a 3-0 playoff win in 2021[9][14]. That kind of record tends to keep underdog prices alive on exchange-style venues, especially where traders can exit before map one ends. Kalshi-style markets, by contrast, are usually more closely tied to event settlement mechanics than to bookmaker margin, while Betfair and Smarkets may be unavailable or restricted depending on user location and KYC checks.
The main catalysts are whether the match starts on schedule and whether both teams field expected line-ups, because any cancellation, postponement beyond seven days, or incomplete series can force the market to 50-50 under the contract terms. Current listings disagree on timing — one source places the fixture on 5 August, while another lists an August 16 slot — so traders will want the official LPL schedule and any broadcast or platform announcements before the settlement window closes[1][8]. TES also arrive with stronger recent form in published match logs, which supports the market’s lean, but schedule changes are the bigger near-term risk than a late model shift.
Methodology
This page compares LoL: EDward Gaming vs Top Esports (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade LoL: EDward Gaming vs Top Esports (BO3) - LPL Group … on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →