Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game Handicap: CPD (-1.5) vs Maryville University (+1.5) | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 100% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 100% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
Market context
Maryville University’s BO3 against Cupid Esports in the North American Challengers League group stage was scheduled for 31 July at 5:00 pm ET, and the market settles on the match result only if the series is actually played and completed in time.[1][4] On Robinhood, the current crowd price of 0% YES implies the contract is effectively being treated as a longshot; on venues that quote decimal odds, such as Betsson and PARI, Cupid Esports was priced around 1.58-1.65 and Maryville around 2.10-2.23, which points to Cupid as a modest favourite rather than an extreme one.[7][16] That makes the market’s 0% reading look far more compressed than the broader sportsbook consensus, while Polymarket presents the same event in yes/no form rather than a traditional moneyline.[4]
Historical framing is thin because this appears to be the teams’ first recorded meeting in the last six months, so traders are leaning mostly on recent form and league positioning rather than head-to-head data.[2][11][12] Bo3.gg highlighted Maryville’s higher overall win rate and steadier recent half-year performance, yet also noted no recent meetings between the sides, while Strafe’s match page split its own user vote 50-50 and listed the series as too close to call.[2][11] In practical terms, that mix supports a market that should be reactive to lineup confirmation and start-time integrity rather than to any deep historical pattern.
The main catalysts are administrative, not tactical: confirmation that the match began on schedule, whether the series was completed, and whether any postponement pushes it beyond the seven-day settlement window that would force a 50-50 outcome.[1][4] SofaScore and other live trackers listed the fixture for 21:00 UTC, and at least one later results page already showed Cupid Esports winning 2-0, which would normally remove most uncertainty if the result is accepted by the market’s timing rules.[1][6] The practical platform comparison is that Robinhood users are exposed to a simple binary price, while Smarkets and Betfair-style books typically let traders read tighter market depth and decimal pricing, but all of them still depend on the same underlying match status and official completion.
Methodology
We read LoL: Maryville University vs Cupid Esports (BO3) - North American Challengers League Group Stage from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Trade LoL: Maryville University vs Cupid Esports (BO3) - N… on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →