Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game 2 Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 90% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 10% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| Game Handicap: SHG (-1.5) vs DetonatioN FocusMe (+1.5) | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
Market context
Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming are due to play DetonatioN FocusMe in a best-of-three LCP group-stage match, and the crowd price of **0% YES** implies the market is effectively assigning no chance to the Hawks side winning outright. That is much lower than the shape of recent match data: one 2026 preview listed Hawks as a clear favourite at around **78%** on user sentiment, while earlier 2025 market snapshots had SHG priced near **1.33** versus DFM **3.16** in decimal terms, which translates to a materially shorter implied win chance than today’s zero print[5][4].
For comparison across venues, Polymarket-style markets quote the binary outcome directly as implied probability, while Betfair and Smarkets typically express the same view through decimal odds that must be converted into probability and then adjusted for commission or fees. That matters here because a zero quote can reflect thin liquidity or a stale book rather than a true statistical impossibility, especially in a regional League of Legends series where head-to-heads have swung both ways: recent result aggregators show SHG leading some 2026 meetings, but DFM still holding the broader historical edge across dozens of matches[15][8][9].
The key catalysts are confirmation of the fixture actually starting on schedule, the published line-up, and any bracket or broadcast changes before the settlement window closes at 15:00 UTC. In practice, traders should watch official LCP match pages and live score services for a postponement, because prediction markets on esports normally settle on the named winner only if the series is completed; a no-show, cancellation, or delay beyond the market rules can void the event instead[1][3][5]. KYC and access also differ by venue: Polymarket and other crypto-native books can be easier to access in some regions, while Betfair and Smarkets are more jurisdiction-restricted and fee-sensitive, which can leave their prices diverging even on the same match.
Methodology
This page compares LoL: Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming vs DetonatioN FocusMe (BO3) - LCP Group Stage specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade LoL: Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming vs DetonatioN Foc… on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →