Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 3 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 3 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 3 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 3 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set Handicap +/-2.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 4 O/U 8.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 4 O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 4 O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 4 Winner | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Total Sets: O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Total Sets: O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Match O/U 36.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Match O/U 38.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Match O/U 40.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Kamil Majchrzak faces Alejandro Tabilo in a first-round Wimbledon ATP singles match on Court 5, London, scheduled for 30 June 2026. The market currently shows a 100% implied probability that Majchrzak will advance, yet traditional bookmakers and other prediction platforms diverge sharply on this outcome. Bleacher Nation lists Majchrzak at -220 odds, implying a 68.8% win chance, while YouTube previews favour Tabilo to advance in a four-set battle[1][2]. This discrepancy highlights how Polymarket’s implied-probability model differs from Betfair’s decimal odds or Kalshi’s fee-structured contracts, where KYC requirements and liquidity depth can skew pricing away from consensus.
Historically, similar 100% market closures in tennis prediction markets have occurred only when matches were cancelled or players withdrew before play, not from genuine competitive certainty. In past Wimbledon rounds, markets resolving to 50-50 after delays beyond seven days have been common, whereas outright 100% closures without a winner are rare and often signal administrative errors rather than sporting inevitability[8]. Traders should monitor official ATP withdrawal notices, court assignments, and weather delays, as these dependencies directly impact settlement. Recent coverage from Tennis.com confirms the match is live and pending, contradicting the 100% closure narrative[6].
Watch for announcements regarding player fitness, especially given Tabilo’s left-handed advantage and Majchrzak’s recent form. Smarkets’ lower fee structure may attract arbitrageurs if the 100% price fails to adjust, while Kalshi’s stricter KYC could limit retail participation. The divergence between platforms underscores that no single book captures the full truth; decimal odds from FanDuel and implied probabilities from Polymarket must be weighed against live score data from SofaScore to assess real risk[5][7]. Until the match concludes, the 100% figure remains an outlier requiring verification against live tournament updates.
Methodology
This page compares Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade Wimbledon ATP: Kamil Majchrzak vs Alejandro Tabilo on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →