Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
99% | 1% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
99% | 1% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Spread -0.5 | 99% |
| Spread -1.5 | 99% |
| Spread -3.5 | 99% |
| Spread -4.5 | 99% |
| Spread -5.5 | 99% |
| Spread -6.5 | 99% |
| Spread -2.5 | 98% |
| Spread -7.5 | 97% |
| Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 97% |
| Spread -13.5 | 96% |
| Spread -8.5 | 95% |
| Spread -10.5 | 95% |
| Spread -14.5 | 94% |
| Spread -16.5 | 93% |
| Spread -17.5 | 93% |
| O/U 35.5 | 93% |
| O/U 37.5 | 93% |
| Spread -20.5 | 92% |
| O/U 39.5 | 90% |
| Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 88% |
| O/U 41.5 | 84% |
| O/U 43.5 | 84% |
| O/U 45.5 | 80% |
| O/U 47.5 | 76% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 75% |
| O/U 49.5 | 72% |
| 1Q O/U 13.5 | 70% |
| O/U 51.5 | 67% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 66% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 64% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 63% |
| O/U 53.5 | 60% |
| O/U 55.5 | 55% |
| 3Q O/U 13.5 | 53% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 33.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 26.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 11.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 13.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 15.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 2H Moneyline | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 51% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 51% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| Spread -17.5 | 50% |
| Spread -8.5 | 50% |
| Spread -6.5 | 50% |
| Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| Spread -4.5 | 50% |
| Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| O/U 57.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 33.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| O/U 59.5 | 43% |
| O/U 61.5 | 40% |
| O/U 63.5 | 32% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 31% |
| O/U 67.5 | 28% |
| O/U 65.5 | 26% |
| O/U 69.5 | 19% |
| O/U 71.5 | 17% |
| O/U 73.5 | 14% |
| Howard O/U 29.5 | 12% |
| O/U 75.5 | 10% |
| Howard O/U 20.5 | 5% |
| Spread -0.5 | 4% |
| Howard O/U 23.5 | 4% |
| Spread -20.5 | 3% |
| Spread -16.5 | 3% |
| Spread -13.5 | 3% |
| Spread -10.5 | 3% |
| Spread -2.5 | 3% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers | 2% |
| Spread -14.5 | 2% |
| Spread -7.5 | 2% |
| Spread -1.5 | 2% |
Market context
The Howard vs. Rutgers prediction market currently prices this outcome at 99% YES. In the upcoming college football game between Howard and Rutgers, scheduled for September 25 at 7:00PM ET: This market will resolve to "Howard" if Howard win the game. This market will resolve to "Rut…
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $147K.
Methodology
This page compares Howard vs. Rutgers specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2210%22%20y%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2244%22%20height%3D%2214%22%20rx%3D%227%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%228%22%20%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2248%22%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
and%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%2010%2026%20A%2022%2028%200%200%201%2054%2026%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
Trade Howard vs. Rutgers on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →