Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| The Hundred: MI London vs Manchester Super Giants | 100% |
| The Hundred: MI London vs Manchester Super Giants - Completed match? | 55% |
| The Hundred: MI London vs Manchester Super Giants - Who wins the toss? | 45% |
Market context
MI London’s Hundred match against Manchester Super Giants at the Oval is already priced as a near-certain result on some prediction venues, but the market is still useful as a check on how much late information is being reflected. On Kalshi, the contract is effectively showing Manchester Super Giants at 95% in price terms, while the crowd-implied view here is 100% YES, so the main difference is presentation: Kalshi shows contract cents, whereas Polymarket-style markets are usually read as implied probability. The practical spread matters more than the headline, because both platforms can still move if a late team-news shock or abandonment risk appears.
Comparable previews frame this as a tight but slightly home-favoured contest rather than a true lock. Independent cricket previews split on the winner, with some leaning to MI London on Oval conditions and recent home strength, while others back Manchester Super Giants on form and batting depth. Statz projections put the game around a low-300 total at the Oval and give MI London a narrow edge in one scenario, but still leave a meaningful band for a close finish or no-result adjustment. That matters for settlement because the market resolves on the final official match result, including ordinary wins via DLS or tiebreaks, so traders should distinguish between *match outcome* and *regulation scoreline*.
The key catalysts are the toss, final XIs and any weather interruption, because The Hundred’s short format makes one innings disproportionately important. Cricbuzz listed Manchester Super Giants as having won the toss and chosen to bowl, which is the kind of pre-match edge that can matter on a venue with a decent batting surface, while the BBC and ESPN fixtures confirm the Oval start and match listing. On platforms with different frictions, the same information can be priced differently: Betfair and Smarkets usually express this via decimal odds and are shaped by exchange fees and available liquidity, while Kalshi and prediction markets translate the same view into a direct yes/no probability, with access and KYC rules varying by jurisdiction.
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $143K.
Methodology
This page compares The Hundred: MI London vs Manchester Super Giants specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Trade The Hundred: MI London vs Manchester Super Giants on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →