Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
12% | 88% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
12% | 88% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| CF Villarreal C 1 - 1 Levante UD | 12% |
| Any Other Score | 12% |
| CF Villarreal C 1 - 0 Levante UD | 9% |
| CF Villarreal C 2 - 1 Levante UD | 9% |
| CF Villarreal C 0 - 0 Levante UD | 8% |
| CF Villarreal C 2 - 0 Levante UD | 7% |
| CF Villarreal C 2 - 2 Levante UD | 7% |
| CF Villarreal C 0 - 1 Levante UD | 5% |
| CF Villarreal C 1 - 2 Levante UD | 5% |
| CF Villarreal C 3 - 1 Levante UD | 5% |
| CF Villarreal C 3 - 0 Levante UD | 4% |
| CF Villarreal C 0 - 2 Levante UD | 3% |
| CF Villarreal C 3 - 2 Levante UD | 3% |
| CF Villarreal C 0 - 3 Levante UD | 2% |
| CF Villarreal C 1 - 3 Levante UD | 2% |
| CF Villarreal C 2 - 3 Levante UD | 2% |
| CF Villarreal C 3 - 3 Levante UD | 2% |
Market context
CF Villarreal C v Levante UD is priced as a low-scoring but still live exact-score proposition, and the current 8% crowd-implied yes rate suggests the market is treating one specific scoreline as plausible but far from the modal outcome. Recent Villarreal–Levante meetings point to enough separation for a favourite, but not to a single dominant score: Villarreal beat Levante 1-0 in La Liga in February 2026 and 5-1 in May 2026, while the sides also played a 3-1 friendly in 2022 and a 0-0 friendly in 2021.[3][9][13][17] Historical head-to-head data is broader but still useful for framing: FootyStats lists Villarreal with more wins overall, while Sportradar’s match history shows Villarreal’s recent edge and Levante’s occasional upset wins, which is the kind of profile that often keeps exact-score markets concentrated on narrow home-win and 2-0/2-1 style outcomes rather than high-scoring blowouts.[3][12][16]
For platform comparison, Polymarket-style markets tend to show a single implied probability, while Betfair and Smarkets users usually think in decimal odds and then translate those into implied probability after fees; the practical difference is that commission and spread matter more on exchange-style venues, especially in exact-score markets where liquidity can be thin. KYC and access also diverge: Betfair and Smarkets are regulated betting venues with account verification and jurisdiction limits, whereas crypto-native prediction markets generally have different onboarding and settlement mechanics, so the same 8% can imply different effective entry costs even if the headline probability matches. The main catalysts are team-sheet confirmation, whether Villarreal C or Levante field first-team players, and any late schedule change before the settlement window closes; the match is listed by multiple live-score services for 5 August 2026, but friendly line-ups can change quickly and that is usually what moves exact-score pricing most sharply.[1][8][18][20]
Methodology
We read CF Villarreal C vs. Levante UD - Exact Score from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade CF Villarreal C vs. Levante UD - Exact Score on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →