Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| AC Horsens 0 - 2 Brøndby IF | 100% |
| AC Horsens 0 - 0 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 0 - 1 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 1 - 0 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 1 - 1 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 2 - 0 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 0 - 3 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 1 - 2 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 2 - 1 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 3 - 0 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 1 - 3 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 2 - 2 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 3 - 1 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 2 - 3 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 3 - 2 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| AC Horsens 3 - 3 Brøndby IF | 0% |
| Any Other Score | 0% |
Market context
AC Horsens host Brøndby IF in a Danish Superliga match that, on historical scoring patterns, has tended to favour Brøndby rather than a home upset. In the available head-to-head data, Brøndby lead the recent series, with FotMob listing 10 wins for Brøndby, 8 for Horsens and 5 draws, while FootyStats also shows Brøndby ahead across the longer sample and BBC’s recent matchup page includes a 2-0 Brøndby win among the latest comparable meetings.[1][6][7] That matters for an exact-score market because “Any Other Score” usually dominates when the market’s named outcomes are too narrow, especially in a fixture where the favourite has often been on the right side of low- and mid-scoring results.[6][7]
The current 0% crowd-implied probability on Polymarket looks more like a structural pricing signal than a forecast that no listed score can happen: exact-score markets are sparse by design, and crowd estimates can stay at zero when liquidity is thin or traders prefer broader match-result contracts. On Betfair Exchange, prices are typically shown as decimal odds rather than implied probabilities, and exchange fees plus KYC availability can shift where marginal money enters; Smarkets uses a similar exchange model but with a different fee schedule, so the same view can appear cheaper or tighter depending on the venue and account access. For Catalysts, the key watchpoints are confirmed line-ups, late injury or suspension news, and any schedule change affecting the settlement window, since the market resolves only on the score after 90 minutes plus stoppage time.[2][3][4][5]
Recent form also points to a game state that can swing away from a clean favourite win: ESPN’s match page shows Horsens opened the season with a 1-2 loss at Midtjylland and Brøndby followed a 1-0 home win over Viborg, which is consistent with a relatively narrow expected margin rather than a high-scoring blowout.[8][10] That keeps common exact-score candidates in play, but it also leaves room for the “Any Other Score” bucket if the match follows a less standard pattern, such as a 1-1 draw, a 2-1 away win, or any late-scoreline variation outside the listed set.[8][10]
Methodology
This page compares AC Horsens vs. Brøndby IF - Exact Score specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade AC Horsens vs. Brøndby IF - Exact Score on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →