Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
94% | 6% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
94% | 6% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots | 94% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots | 90% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots | 86% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots | 83% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots on target | 72% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots | 70% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots on target | 67% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots | 58% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots | 57% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots | 55% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots on target | 55% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Jordan Pickford: 5+ saves | 50% |
| Raúl Rangel: 3+ saves | 50% |
| Raúl Rangel: 5+ saves | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots | 49% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots | 49% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 4+ shots | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 5+ shots | 48% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots on target | 48% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jordan Pickford: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 4+ saves | 48% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots | 47% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots | 46% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots | 42% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals + assists | 41% |
| Armando González: 5+ shots | 39% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals | 38% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals + assists | 38% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots | 37% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots on target | 37% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots | 36% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals + assists | 36% |
| Jordan Pickford: 3+ saves | 34% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals + assists | 34% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots | 33% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots | 33% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots | 32% |
| Armando González: 4+ shots | 32% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots | 32% |
| Ollie Watkins: 5+ shots | 32% |
| Jordan Pickford: 4+ saves | 32% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots on target | 31% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ goals + assists | 31% |
| Harry Kane: 5+ shots | 30% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals + assists | 30% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals + assists | 29% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals | 27% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals + assists | 27% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals + assists | 26% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots | 25% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals | 24% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots on target | 24% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ goals + assists | 22% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ goals + assists | 22% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ shots | 21% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ shots | 19% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals + assists | 19% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots on target | 16% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals | 15% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots on target | 15% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ goals | 14% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ shots | 14% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots on target | 14% |
| Marcus Rashford: 5+ shots | 12% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ assists | 12% |
| Armando González: 1+ goals | 11% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 5+ shots | 11% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ assists | 11% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ goals | 10% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ assists | 10% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals | 9% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals + assists | 8% |
| Julián Quiñones: 5+ shots | 7% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ assists | 7% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots on target | 7% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ goals | 6% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots | 4% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals + assists | 4% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals | 3% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots | 2% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Armando González: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Armando González: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 5+ shots | 1% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ goals | 0% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals | 0% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals | 0% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ goals | 0% |
Market context
The FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash between Mexico and England at Estadio Banorte in Mexico City is set for 8:00 PM ET on 5 July, with England favoured to advance by a narrow margin despite the altitude factor. Current market pricing suggests England are slight favourites at -108 to Mexico’s +108, while the crowd-implied probability of 11% YES on Mexico winning reflects a near-coin-toss scenario where tournament experience clashes with home advantage [1][4].
Historically, matches played in Mexico’s high-altitude venues have produced tight, low-scoring affairs or sudden goal bursts, as seen in previous World Cup encounters where home teams leveraged environmental conditions to neutralise superior opposition quality [1]. Comparable Round of 16 games often end in extra time, with projections leaning toward a 1-0 England win built on defensive discipline and a single moment from Harry Kane, who remains the shortest-priced anytime goal scorer at +155 [2][3].
Traders should monitor late squad announcements for Kane’s fitness and any tactical shifts from both managers, as these dependencies directly impact player prop outcomes [3]. Recent coverage from Covers.com highlights Over 2.5 goals as the strongest bet, with odds at +140, while platforms diverge on fee structures and KYC requirements: Polymarket offers decimal odds without KYC, whereas Kalshi and Betfair impose stricter identity checks and vary in implied probability versus decimal pricing models [1][6].
Methodology
We read Mexico vs. England - Player Props from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Trade Mexico vs. England - Player Props on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →