Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| FC Dallas | 100% |
| CD Guadalajara | 0% |
| Draw | 0% |
Market context
CD Guadalajara’s Leagues Cup tie with FC Dallas is priced as an extreme outsider on the current crowd read, with **0% YES** implying the market is treating a Guadalajara win or qualifying outcome as effectively off the board. That matters because the same event can look very different across platforms: on Polymarket the crowd-implied figure is the headline, while on Kalshi you are more likely to see a contract price that maps to implied probability; Betfair and Smarkets instead express the market through decimal odds and exchange commission, so a small move in odds can translate into a bigger or smaller probability shift depending on fees and liquidity.
Recent form gives more context than the zero alone. The teams have only a sparse direct record, with Guadalajara and Dallas having split two older meetings, and the more recent performances point to a competitive but volatile matchup: Guadalajara drew 1-1 with LAFC in Leagues Cup play, while Dallas beat Querétaro 2-0 and had a goalless MLS draw at LA Galaxy in the run-up to this fixture.[2][7][9] Guadalajara’s broader recent league form has also been mixed, with low-scoring results and several draws, which helps explain why a platform like Betfair may show a different live probability from Polymarket if traders weight the draw and low-scoring routes differently.[1][10]
The main catalysts are squad availability, confirmed line-ups, and the timing/location of the match, because these Leagues Cup games can move quickly when travel, rotation, or knockout implications are clarified. Public listings place the game at PayPal Park in San Jose with an August 9 UTC kick-off, and the market closes just before that window ends, so any late team-news post, travel update, or change to the match schedule can matter materially.[4][8][13] For a trader comparing venues, KYC and access also differ: Polymarket and Kalshi are more geographically restricted than open exchanges such as Betfair or Smarkets, which can affect who is able to enter liquidity and how fast the price adjusts when fresh information lands.
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $298K.
Methodology
This page compares CD Guadalajara vs. FC Dallas specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Trade CD Guadalajara vs. FC Dallas on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →