Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| New York City FC 1 - 1 Toronto FC | 100% |
| New York City FC 0 - 0 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 0 - 1 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 1 - 0 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 0 - 2 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 2 - 0 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 0 - 3 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 1 - 2 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 2 - 1 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 3 - 0 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 1 - 3 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 2 - 2 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 3 - 1 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 2 - 3 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 3 - 2 Toronto FC | 0% |
| New York City FC 3 - 3 Toronto FC | 0% |
| Any Other Score | 0% |
Market context
New York City FC host Toronto FC in an MLS regular-season match, and the market is an exact-score contract settled on the final score after 90 minutes plus stoppage time only. Recent head-to-head results point towards a tighter, lower-scoring baseline than a pure coin-flip: NYCFC beat Toronto 3-1 on 3 July 2025, won 1-0 in Toronto in April 2025, and have avoided defeat in five straight meetings according to recent match databases.[15][11][4] That history matters because exact-score markets are usually dominated by a few common outcomes, while the crowd-implied 0% YES suggests the listed scoreline is priced as a long shot rather than impossible.
For platform comparison, Polymarket-style contracts typically show *implied probability* directly, whereas Kalshi, Betfair and Smarkets are easier to read through *decimal odds* plus fees, so the same view can look different after commissions and spreads. Betfair and Smarkets also add exchange-style charges, while access and KYC breadth differ: Kalshi is US-regulated, whereas Betfair and Smarkets have more fragmented country-by-country availability. On the football side, recent data show NYCFC’s home meetings with Toronto have produced a run of home wins for New York and several one- or two-goal margins, which supports why the market may be concentrated around a small set of scores rather than spread evenly across “Any Other Score”.[3][8][12]
The main catalyst to watch is simply whether both clubs field first-choice attacking XIs, because line-ups move exact-score pricing more sharply than in match-winner markets. NYCFC’s own pre-match notes highlighted that the clubs combined for five first-half goals in a 4-4 draw earlier in the season, underlining that this fixture can still swing into a high-event game if transitions open up.[8] For settlement, the key dependency is the official full-time score line reported by the match feed; if the fixture were delayed or altered, the market stays open until completion under the rules you provided.
Methodology
This page compares New York City FC vs. Toronto FC - Exact Score specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade New York City FC vs. Toronto FC - Exact Score on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →