Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
72% | 28% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
72% | 28% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica | 72% |
| Draw | 20% |
| Heart of Midlothian FC | 8% |
Market context
Heart of Midlothian’s second-leg trip to Benfica is priced by the crowd at about **8%** for a Hearts win, which is broadly consistent with a heavy away underdog in a Europa League qualifying tie. On Betfair and Smarkets, that kind of price is usually read through **decimal odds** and then converted into an implied probability, while Polymarket presents the outcome directly as a percentage, making the gap between market view and exchange margin easier to compare. Recent market pages and live reporting also point in the same direction: Benfica have already established a clear aggregate lead after a 6-1 first-leg win in Lisbon, and Hearts are being treated as a long shot even before home advantage is considered.[10][17][18]
The main comparator for traders is how each venue handles price discovery and access. Betfair and Smarkets are exchange-led, so the effective cost depends on commission and the available back/lay spread, while Polymarket’s yes/no structure embeds the crowd’s consensus more cleanly but without a traditional order-book distinction between backing and laying in the same way. KYC and jurisdiction matter too: exchange access is more familiar in the UK and Europe, whereas platform eligibility can differ sharply by market and region, so the same football view may be tradable on one venue and restricted on another. In practical terms, the 8% line says the market is already assuming Benfica complete the job unless team news, rotation or an unexpected change in match conditions alters the underlying probability.[8][15]
For catalysts, the key watch points are Benfica’s team selection, any late injury or suspension updates, and whether the tie is treated as effectively decided before kick-off. The scheduled fixture is at Tynecastle Park on 13 August, with official listings already pointing to the second leg as the relevant settlement event for this market.[6] Any change in aggregate context, travel planning, or manager comments on rotation would matter more here than generic form lines, because the first leg has already shifted the trading question from “who is better?” to “how much risk does Benfica accept in a game they are heavily expected to control?”
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $50K.
Methodology
We read Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →