Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| del Valle to win by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| Darren Elkins vs. Yadier del Valle | 0% |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 0% |
| Elkins to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% |
| O/U 0.5 Rounds | 0% |
| O/U 1.5 Rounds | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Rounds | 0% |
Market context
Darren Elkins met Yadier del Valle in a featherweight prelim at UFC Fight Night, and the market’s 0% crowd-implied YES price implies traders had already treated a del Valle win as overwhelmingly likely before the result settled. On the pre-fight numbers, del Valle carried the cleaner striking profile, with higher significant strikes landed per minute and markedly better accuracy, while Elkins leaned more on wrestling volume and durability[9][1]. That split helps explain why exchange-style markets can diverge: Polymarket and Kalshi quote direct implied probability, while Betfair and Smarkets usually present decimal odds, so a short-priced favourite can look more extreme on a probability chart than on an odds ladder, especially once fees are included.
Comparable fight data also points away from a clean Elkins upset narrative. UFC Stats lists Elkins at 29-12 and del Valle at 10-1, with Elkins landing 3.40 significant strikes per minute but absorbing 3.34, versus del Valle’s 4.05 landed and 2.16 absorbed[9]. Del Valle’s knockout loss column was still zero before the bout, while Elkins had been stopped multiple times, which matters in a fast-start matchup where one early exchange can decide settlement[1][3]. For platform comparison, the same underlying fight can therefore trade differently across venues: on Kalshi and Polymarket the question is the event outcome probability, whereas on Betfair or Smarkets the displayed price already reflects the market-maker margin and back/lay spread rather than a pure probability reading.
The main catalysts were the official bout allocation, weigh-in confirmation, and the UFC result announcement after the prelim finished; once the bout went to the official scorecard or stoppage announcement, resolution depended only on UFC’s declared winner. That makes timing important for traders on platforms with different settlement mechanics, because a late cancellation or no contest would have forced the market towards 50-50 under the contract terms. For a live comparison, KYC and access also matter: Kalshi is US-regulated and KYC-gated, while Betfair and Smarkets availability depends on jurisdiction, which affects who can participate and how quickly liquidity reprices after the official outcome.
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $426K.
Methodology
This page compares UFC Fight Night: Darren Elkins vs. Yadier del Valle (Featherweight, Prelims) specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Darren Elkins vs. Yadier del Valle … on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →