Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| Stirling to win by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 Rounds | 100% |
| Jan Blachowicz vs. Navajo Stirling | 0% |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 0% |
| Blachowicz to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% |
| O/U 1.5 Rounds | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Rounds | 0% |
Market context
Jan Blachowicz’s light-heavyweight meeting with Navajo Stirling is priced very differently across venues: sportsbook-style markets currently show Stirling as a clear favourite, with odds around -325 to -335 and Blachowicz roughly +240 to +270, which translates to an implied win chance in the mid-70s before vig. On a platform like Polymarket, a 0% YES print is harder to reconcile with the wider market because the contract only resolves on the official UFC result, so the key question is whether that price reflects a stale, thin, or disconnected order book rather than a genuine view of the bout. [1][7][9]
The comparable-case frame still points towards Stirling being the more likely winner: recent previews describe him as the busier striker, with a reach and youth edge, while Blachowicz’s path is usually to slow the pace, force clinches and make the fight physical. One analytics model and several previews lean to Stirling, often by decision, but Blachowicz’s durability and grappling make a clean read less certain than the headline favourite price suggests. That matters for platforms that quote differently: Betfair and Smarkets display decimal odds and percentage-like implied probabilities, while Kalshi and Polymarket price directly in cents, so the same opinion can look much cheaper or more expensive depending on fee structure and liquidity. [3][5][9][11][14]
For traders, the main catalysts are official UFC bout status, weigh-in health, and any late card reshuffles, because the market only settles on an official winner and can flip to 50-50 if the fight is ruled a no contest, not scored, cancelled, or pushed beyond the settlement deadline. Recent coverage also notes an expected live broadcast slot and a fight-week price that still had Stirling around -325, so any late injury or commission issue would be the most relevant trigger for a rapid repricing across exchange and sportsbook-style books. Access also differs by venue: Polymarket and Kalshi are US-facing but KYC-restricted, whereas Betfair and Smarkets depend on jurisdiction, which can affect who can trade the move if the market tightens close to the bell. [1][7][9]
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $598K.
Methodology
We read UFC Fight Night: Jan Blachowicz vs. Navajo Stirling (Light Heavyweight, Main Card) from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Jan Blachowicz vs. Navajo Stirling … on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →