Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| First Blood in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs Karmine Corp (+1.5) | 100% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs Karmine Corp (+2.5) | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 100% |
| Game 1 Winner | 100% |
| Game 2 Winner | 100% |
| Game 3 Winner | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 45.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 48.5 in Game 2? | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Game 4 Winner | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 45.5 in Game 1? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 51.5 in Game 2? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 45.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 1? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 54.5 in Game 2? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 3? | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is the upper-bracket final of the 2026 Mid-Season Invitational Play-In, where T1 faces Karmine Corp in a best-of-five series scheduled for 28 June at 23:00 ET. T1 entered this match after sweeping Team Liquid 3–0 in the winners’ bracket, a result that underscored Faker’s historic consistency and cemented T1 as the dominant force in the tournament[7]. The crowd-implied probability of 100% YES for T1 reflects not just their recent form but a broader pattern in elite LoL where established champions rarely lose to emerging regional contenders in decisive bracket finals.
Historically, similar 100% implied probabilities in LoL major tournaments have resolved to the favoured team unless external disruptions occur, such as match cancellations or forfeits due to technical failures. In the 2023 MSI, a 98% implied probability for T1 against JDG resolved to T1 after a clean 3–1 victory, reinforcing the reliability of such odds when backed by superior roster depth and tactical experience[7]. Traders should monitor official tournament announcements for schedule shifts, player availability, or potential delays beyond seven days, which would trigger a 50–50 resolution. Recent coverage from Liquipedia confirms the match is set to begin at 03:00 UTC on 29 June, with no indications of disruption so far[6].
When comparing platforms like Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair, and Smarkets, key divergences emerge in how this market is framed: Polymarket uses decimal odds and low fees with minimal KYC, while Kalshi requires full identity verification and offers implied probability pricing with higher regulatory oversight. Betfair and Smarkets, as traditional exchanges, emphasise liquidity depth and decimal odds but impose stricter KYC and geographic restrictions. For this specific market, Polymarket’s 100% implied probability translates to 1.00 decimal odds with negligible fees, whereas Kalshi might present the same as 99.5% implied probability with a 1% fee structure, subtly altering the trader’s edge depending on platform choice.
Methodology
We read LoL: T1 vs Karmine Corp (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Trade LoL: T1 vs Karmine Corp (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitatio… on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →