🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGet started →

Tunisia vs. Netherlands - More Markets

Cross-platform snapshot for "Tunisia vs. Netherlands - More Markets": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Over 28% Under 72% Volume: $2.3M Liquidity: $4.7M Closes: 25 Jun 2026
Trade on PolyGram →
Tunisia vs. Netherlands - More Markets

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
PolyGram Pick
polygram.ink
28% 72% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open on PolyGram →
Polymarket
polymarket.com
28% 72% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open on PolyGram →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open on PolyGram →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open on PolyGram →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open on PolyGram →

Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on PolyGram.

Active sub-markets

O/U 4.528% Over72% Under
O/U 0.598% Over2% Under
Tunisia (-1.5)1% Tunisia99% Netherlands
Tunisia (-2.5)0% Tunisia100% Netherlands
O/U 2.570% Over31% Under
Both Teams to Score36% YES65% NO

Market context

The FIFA World Cup Group F match between Tunisia and the Netherlands is scheduled for 7:00 PM ET on June 25, 2026, in Kansas City, with the Netherlands entering as clear favourites due to their superior FIFA ranking and unbeaten qualifying campaign[1]. The Netherlands possess deeper attacking options, including Cody Gakpo and Frenkie de Jong, while Tunisia’s recent defensive frailties are evident after a 5–1 loss to Sweden[1]. This specific market, “More Markets,” currently implies a 28% probability that the game will feature more than the standard number of set-piece or penalty events, reflecting the Dutch team’s dominance and the neutral venue offering no home advantage to narrow the contest[1].

Historical precedents suggest this 28% figure is conservative given Tunisia’s inability to advance past the group stage in seven prior World Cup appearances, with traders pricing their elimination at nearly 90%[5]. Conversely, the Netherlands are projected to reach the Round of 32 with a 40% implied probability, indicating a high likelihood of a competitive match that could generate extra time or penalty scenarios if the Dutch fail to secure an early lead[6]. The gap in recent form is stark, with the Dutch drawing 2–2 against Japan while Tunisia suffered a heavy defeat, reinforcing the market’s implied probabilities regarding match dynamics and potential for additional stoppages[1].

Traders should monitor the over/under 3.5 goals line, which Yahoo Sports suggests is likely to be cleared given the Netherlands have scored seven goals in two games[7]. The divergence between platforms is notable: Polymarket structures every price as a direct probability (e.g., 25¢ equals 25%), whereas traditional books like Betfair or Oddschecker use decimal odds that require conversion to implied probability[8]. Additionally, Polymarket typically offers lower fees and no mandatory KYC for smaller trades compared to Kalshi’s strict regulatory requirements, creating distinct liquidity pools for this specific outcome[8]. The settlement window ends on 2026-06-25, meaning any late-match penalties or extra-time decisions will resolve the market immediately[1].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We read Tunisia vs. Netherlands - More Markets from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live quote comes directly from the Polygon order book; the other three are listed with their platform attributes — fees, KYC, settlement currency, payment options — because a 1:1 contract comparison without API access would be guesswork.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
How fast are USDC deposits?
Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Tunisia vs. Netherlands - More Markets on PolyGram

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Trade on PolyGram →