Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Traders on decentralised prediction markets give 100% probability to cincinnati open, qualification: oksana selekhmeteva vs elizabeth mandlik. This market refers to the tennis match between Oksana Selekhmeteva and Elizabeth Mandlik in the Cincinnati Open, Qualification, originally scheduled for August 11, 2026 at 12:00PM ET. This market wil…
Methodology
We read Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elizabeth Mandlik from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Oksana Selekhmeteva … on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →