Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Robinhood Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
67% | 33% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
67% | 33% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Newport: Jacob Fearnley vs Stefan Kozlov | 67% |
| Completed Match | 50% |
Market context
Jacob Fearnley faces Stefan Kozlov in the Newport Challenger grass-court match, originally set for 9 July 2026 at 6:05 PM ET, with Fearnley currently favoured to advance. The market implies a 66% probability of Fearnley winning, translating to decimal odds of roughly 1.52, whereas platforms like Betfair and Smarkets would display these as 1.52 decimal rather than implied percentages, and Polymarket users often trade on the probability itself without converting to odds. Fee structures diverge sharply here: Kalshi charges no trading fees but enforces strict KYC, while Polymarket applies a 2% fee on profits and permits anonymous access, creating a liquidity gap for traders prioritising privacy versus regulatory compliance.
Historically, Fearnley has shown resilience on grass, notably defeating Mark Lajal 6-2, 6-4 in Nottingham 2024 qualifications, and Tennis Tonic’s analysts picked him as the three-set winner in Newport with initial odds of 1.55[1]. However, Fearnley and Kozlov share no prior head-to-head record, a critical void that inflates uncertainty compared to matches with established rivalry data[7]. Comparable Newport Challenger cases show that unseeded players with recent grass success, like Fearnley, often outperform implied probabilities when opponents lack surface-specific form, yet Kozlov’s 2019 Little Rock victory over Garrett Johns suggests he can capitalise on early momentum if Fearnley falters in the opening sets[9].
Traders must monitor the official ATP draw updates and any weather-related delays, as Newport’s grass courts are sensitive to humidity and rain, which could postpone play beyond the seven-day settlement window and trigger a 50-50 resolution[3]. The match is live as of 9 July 23:15 UTC, with both players at 0-0, indicating the contest has commenced but remains undecided[2]. Recent coverage from Tennis Tonic highlights Fearnley’s preference for three-set battles, suggesting a trader should watch for Kozlov’s ability to force a tiebreak in the first set, a catalyst that could shift the probability toward Kozlov if Fearnley’s serve efficiency drops below 60%[1]. No major injury announcements have been issued, but the ATP Tour’s live scoreboard remains the primary source for real-time dependencies affecting the outcome[3].
Methodology
This page compares Newport: Jacob Fearnley vs Stefan Kozlov specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Robinhood Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Robinhood Prediction Markets has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Robinhood Prediction Markets offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade Newport: Jacob Fearnley vs Stefan Kozlov on Robinhood Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →