Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PolyGram Pick polygram.ink |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on PolyGram → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on PolyGram → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on PolyGram → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on PolyGram → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on PolyGram → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on PolyGram.
Active sub-markets
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% Zeitune | 100% Zanellato |
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% Over | 100% Under |
| Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato | 0% Maximo Zeitune | 100% Nicolas Zanellato |
Market context
The underlying event is the ATP Challenger tennis match in Piracicaba, Brazil, between Maximo Zeitune and Nicolas Zanellato, which began on 25 June 2026 at Quadra 3. The match was interrupted after Zeitune lost the first set, with the score recorded as 0–1, and the crowd-implied probability of 100% YES suggests the market expects a definitive outcome despite the disruption. Historical precedents in clay-court Challenger events show that interrupted matches on this surface often resume within 24 hours, particularly when weather is stable, and the 50–50 resolution clause for delays beyond seven days is rarely triggered in Brazilian tournaments where scheduling flexibility is high.
Traders should monitor official ATP Challenger announcements for resumption times and any player injury updates, as these directly determine whether the match concludes or triggers the tie resolution. Recent coverage from Tennis.com confirms the match status as "interrupted" and notes that broadcast and live-score platforms are awaiting further directives from tournament officials, indicating that the next catalyst is an administrative decision rather than a new on-court event. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi diverge here: Polymarket uses decimal odds and lower fees with minimal KYC, while Kalshi relies on implied probability and strict US compliance, meaning the 100% YES price may reflect liquidity concentration on one platform rather than universal consensus across all books.
The settlement window ending 30 June 2026 provides ample time for the match to resume, reducing the risk of the 50–50 outcome. Fee structures and KYC requirements further influence price divergence; Betfair and Smarkets impose higher transaction costs and identity verification, which can suppress liquidity on niche markets like this compared to the more accessible, fee-efficient platforms. The current probability reflects a strong expectation of completion, but the interrupted status remains a critical dependency that could shift the market if resumption is delayed beyond the tournament’s internal scheduling limits.
Methodology
We read Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live quote comes directly from the Polygon order book; the other three are listed with their platform attributes — fees, KYC, settlement currency, payment options — because a 1:1 contract comparison without API access would be guesswork.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). PolyGram routes every trade directly into Polymarket's on-chain settlement, which is why payouts land fastest.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?
- Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Piracicaba: Maximo Zeitune vs Nicolas Zanellato on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on PolyGram →